steretyping大學教授

⑴ 求一篇關於籃球的英文演講稿 急！！！！

籃球的歷史History of Basketball
Basketball. The world's greatest sport ever. But of course, it hasn't been around since the world began. No, somebody had to have invented it. And that somebody would be James Naismith.

Born in Almonte, Ontario, Canada, this Canadian Gym Teacher and Physician would soon be the founder of basketball. It all started in December of 1891. Naismith was teaching in Springfield, Massachusetts and was asked by Luther H. Gulick, the Headmaster of the school for Christian Works to make a new sport. The main idea of the sport was mainly to be played inside when it was too cold to go outside. The new sport also had to keep athletes in their top conditions between the baseball and football season. Naismith began to work. The first game-ball was a soccer ball.

The first baskets were peach baskets that Naismith cleverly thought of hanging on the wall. From there, the legacy of basketball began. Originally, there was 9 men to each team, but the objective was still the same; to pass the ball to other players on your team and put the ball in the opposing team's net, or basket back then. From there, basketball caught on like a wildfire.

During 1885 highschools and colleges began to adopt the game, and by 1898, the first Pro League was founded. After the first game played, Naismith drafted 13 rules and regulations, but many more were yet to come. The hoops we know today were invented in 1906. They were steel, with a net hanging from it's rim.
籃球作為世界上最偉大的運動之一，並不是憑空而來，它一定有自己的發明者。這個發明者，就是James Naismith。James 出生於加拿大的安大略，他曾是一個體育教師。在1891年他在馬塞諸塞教授體育的時候，學校的校長讓他為基督教的活動想出一種運動，而這種運動一定要在室內進行，因為室外很冷。這種運動，按照校長的要求，一定要使運動員保持棒球和足球比賽時的激情。於是，他就開始思考這項運動。經過思考，他想出了一種方法：在牆上掛網子，然後把球扔向這個用網子做的籃子里。從此，籃球得以產生。本來，每個隊伍有9個隊員，但是規則是：把球傳向自己隊伍的隊員，然後設法投向對方的筐子里。從此，籃球就很快傳播開來。1885年，高中和大學都開始採用這種運動方式，到1898年，第一個籃球聯盟成立。第一次比賽後，James設計了13個比賽規則。籃球筐子的邊緣框架是在1906年設計的，材料是鋼。

Dr. James Naismith is known world-wide as the inventor of basketball. He was born in 1861 in Ramsay township, near Almonte, Ontario, Canada. The concept of basketball was born from Naismith』s school days in the area where he played a simple child』s game known as ck-on-a-rock outside his one-room schoolhouse. The game involved attempting to knock a "ck" off the top of a large rock by tossing another rock at it. Naismith went on to attend McGill University in Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
James 作為世界聞名的籃球發明家，出生於1861年的Ramsay小鎮，位於加拿大的安大略。他發明籃球的點子是來自他小時候玩的一種游戲，叫「ck-on-a-rock」。這種游戲就是用一塊石頭把另一塊石頭打掉。James 後來轉去了魁北克的Montreal大學教授課程。

⑵ 關於教育的雅思作文及分析

教育 是雅思寫作非常愛考的話題了，話不多說，看看我給大家分享的關於教育的雅思 作文 及分析。

雅思大作文教育類話題

1. 教育應該包括哪些內容

母題：It is generally believed that ecation is of vital importance to the development of indivials and the well-being of societies. What should ecation consist of to fulfil both these functions?

提示：本題圍繞教育的兩大功能來展開(個人與社會)，准備好這篇 文章 ，即可應付教育類話題中的最大分支—教育的功能，做到以不變應萬變。對於社會角度，可以從促進經濟發展、增加社會流動性(social mobility)、維護社會穩定這幾個方面來展開，對於個人，可以寫改變思維模式、有利於就業和便利生活來寫。

子題：大學應當教授理論知識還是實踐技能?大學的是應當把學生培養成合格的公民還是讓他們自己得益?准備未來職業最好的 方法 是上大學還是盡快離校積累工作 經驗 ?大學要不要擴招?中學階段應當提供通才教育還是專才教育?要不要延長義務教育年限?要不要讓農村地區的學生更容易上學?老師要教學生如何判斷是非嗎?

2. 學校的科目誰來選擇

母題：Some people think that the government should decide which subjects students should study at the university, while others think that students should be allowed to apply for the subject they prefer. Discuss the two views and give your opinion.

提示：這類題目採取的策略就是「雙批判」，因為題目中提供的兩種選擇往往都是錯誤的。

子題1：政府選課or 老師選課?學生選擇所有的科目or根據興趣自行選擇?

子題2：只有學術科目重要，體育和音樂這樣的課不重要，你同意嗎?要不要學國際新聞?要不要學歷史?要不要中學階段就學習外語?要不要學數學哲學這類的科目?

提示：子題2與母題聯系不大，需要准備這些科目各自的優點。

3. 什麼樣的教學方式最好

母題：Many people use distance-learning programmes (study material post, TV, Internet, etc.) to study at home, but some people think that it cannot bring the benefit as much as attending college or university. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

提示：遠程教育最大的好處，就在於三個any：anybody, anywhere, any time. 缺點是缺乏師生之間以及學生之間的interaction, 缺乏教師的moral guidance, 因為沒有體育課且久坐電腦前，會引發健康問題。

子題：私立學校好不好? 留學 好不好?要不要分快慢班?小組學習還是單獨學習好?

4. 誰來為學費買單

母題：Some people believe that university students should pay all the cost of studies because university ecation only benefit the students themselves not the society as a whole. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

提示：這些話題都有一個共同的特徵：高等教育只對學生自己有好處，因此學生應當自行為高等教育買單。這類題目的寫法非常有規律，先駁斥這種理由，再交代學生自己支付學費的後果就可以了。

子題：政府要為學生買單嗎?(缺點是給政府帶來經濟負擔，這類話題寫法和 其它 政府類話題一樣)

5. 家庭教育

母題：Some people say that children should obey the rules of their parents and teachers, while other people think children will not be well-prepared for their alt life if they are given too much control. Discuss in both sides and give your opinion.

提示：寫一下各自的好處就可以了，最後的結論是早年的時候要教授他們明辨是非，對於做錯的事情要懲罰，但是也要適可而止讓其 興趣 愛好 得到自由發展。

子題：窮人家的孩子是否早當家?家長是否應該為五歲小孩的犯罪負責?要不要把小孩趁早送到學校去?老師對 兒童 的智力和社會發展所起的作用大於家長嗎?同齡人壓力(peer pressure)的利弊?

雅思寫作教育類話題思路講解

題目分析：students in school or university learn more from classes of teachers than other resources(eg.internet or TV) do you agree or disagree?

這類題目又多次改頭換面地出現在考場中，所以大家對於這種頻繁光顧的話題一定要認真復習。沒准你就可以通過通過再現練習或者課堂的方式在考場上斬獲作文的高分。

文章結構第一段：開頭段，引出自己的觀點，即可以從老師身上學到更多的知識。

第二段：第一個分論點，認為學習不僅僅是學習知識的簡單傳遞，而且還是師生間的互動。

第三段：第二個分論點，認為從老師身上不僅可以學到知識，而且老師可以為學生提供監管。第四段：駁論段，說明在學生也可以從其它方面資源地方學習。第五段： 自然結尾，重申主題。

範文 ：

The updated understanding of study and the cutting-edge technology(尖端科技) usher in an era when the students can have a variety of ways to acquire knowledge(學習知識). Although there are other forms to obtain knowledge and information, I am still the proponent(支持者) of the belief that students can learn more from their teachers than other resources.Study, to some degrees, is not a one-way input of knowledge, while it is the procere of mutual interaction between teachers and students. In theconventional teaching and learning mode(傳統的教學和學習模式), teachers and students co-exist in an environment where they can have timely interaction. This means teachers can have a more comprehensive and directly understanding of their students』 shortcomings and strong points, which guarantees that students can learn more from the courses that are tailored(量體裁衣的，有針對性的)to their needs.It is apparent that students can obtain more knowledge from their teachers because teachers do not only function as craftsmen(匠人，工匠) who only impart knowledge(傳遞知識) but also serve as a supervisor or a guardian.

This is especially true in the case where students are less self-disciplined (自律的)and are inclined to go astray (誤入歧途)without the supervision and guidance of teachers. By comparison, others resources of learning such as Internet and TV sometimes are likely to make the students distracted e to a host of irrelevant information,(不相關信息) which will undermine (一點點削弱)their learning efficiency and make students learn less.It is also true that students are likely to learn more from other resources. Internet and TV are two media where there are a wealth of (很多)knowledge and information ranging from science and humanity.

They are also the easily accessible platforms for the students who are in the remote places(偏遠地區)where the teaching resources are not so abundant (充足的)as that in more developed regions. However, other learning resources can hardly challenge the dominant role (主導地位)played by teachers.To sum up, teachers are still the primary resource from whom the student can gain knowledge, although the influence of other learning resources cannot be underestimated.

雅思大作文教育類話題範文

題目：Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

範文：

Although the idea of gender equality in society, is a laudable concept, I believe a more modest adjustment of severely gender-imbalanced courses would be more practical than a draconian imposition of a 50/50 balance in all university courses.

Some people feel that females are underrepresented and do not have equal opportunities in certain professions such as upper management and engineering while others believe society would be better served if more males worked in some professions such as nursing, translating and primary school teaching. Both groups feel that not only competition for university places but also social stereotyping plays a role here; that is, if a more gender-balanced workforce were visible, then more young people would feel that it would be socially acceptable for them to follow suit and enter professions that are traditionally associated with the opposite sex.

I agree with these arguments but the correction of gender inequality and imbalance in the workplace cannot take place in the universities only — changes should also be made in society as a whole, including ecation at the pre-university level. Furthermore, the sudden imposition of a rigid 50/50 gender balance in university classes, where there is usually, say, an 80/20 male/female ratio, would probably result in many highly qualified and highly motivated males losing out to some females who were not very academically qualified for those courses and possibly not very interested in pursuing those professions.

On the other hand, if the last 1.0% of class allotments in heavily imbalanced classes were reserved for the 'minority』 sex, and if academic standards were not drastically compromised in the process, then I believe society would benefit.